Dailypharm Live Search Close

[Reporter's view] The MFDS shouldn't selectively explain

By Lee, Tak-Sun | translator Choi HeeYoung

21.07.23 06:10:10

°¡³ª´Ù¶ó 0



In a recent series of incidents, the MFDS did not properly explain, causing confusion. It wasn't a big issue, but it's not something to skip.

The issue of whether the RNA-based QTP104, which was approved for phase 1 clinical trial on the 20th, was initially marked as "domestic development" on a site where approval status can be checked, but it was changed to "foreign development." A reporter raised a question through an article, and this time it was changed to "domestic development."

As a result, there was confusion among reporters. The vaccine could not be clearly processed because it was not distinguished whether it was the first RNA-based or overseas vaccine. As of 4 p.m. on the 22nd,

Lee, Tak-Sun(hooggasi2@dailypharm.com)
If you want to see the full article, please JOIN US (click)